The Myths: VBC is about Money
- Value Based Care (VBC) is a way for insurance companies to make more money
- VBC is just another way for the government to interfere in doctor’s healthcare efforts
The Facts: VBC is about Increasing Value & Individualized Patient Care
- VBC is a process that helps Docs focus back on caring for the patient the way we thought we would be doing when we went to medical school.
- It’s about adding more ‘value’ to our workflow rather than relying on seeing large ‘volumes’ of patients every day to make a living.
Value Based Care is a much more enjoyable way to practice and it’s more comfortable for patients as well when Providers (aka Doctors, Nurses and other Caregivers) understand the beauty of it. When we focus on improved health outcomes for our patients using the HEDIS/Stars measures (think about these measures as the Caregiver’s VBC Process checklist) all the time, we’re able to improve our efficiency. VBC based systems are now set up to pay the Providers for the better outcomes (Quality OVER Quantity) achieved through better documentation and data usage.
Story Time: A Personal Example
Several months ago, I had the opportunity to speak to a very caring, wonderful Doc who avoided the VBC system for years because he whole heartedly believed in those myths we discussed above. When he realized the facts and he and his partners started trying out the VBC guidelines, the process led them to find dozens of early cancers in their patients through a six-month timeline that ultimately saved lives. If they had continued to follow their old treatment standards, these cancers would have been found when it was much later, or not at all.
This happened because they began to spend more time with patients explaining to them why they needed wellness testing that would find their cancers early rather than waiting for advanced cancers ugly symptoms. Before this, they would suggest this testing and if the patient didn’t go for the tests, they just let the patients make that decision without truly digging deeper, offering guidance and listening to the patient’s genuine concerns. By taking the time to explain WHY the tests were not only important, but important for them as individuals, the patients got tested and lives were saved. This is more cost-effective care because it’s cheaper to treat early cancer than advanced cancer.
In this scenario:
- Patients stayed healthy, rather than getting sick and money was saved both long-term and short-term for patients and doctors.
- Patients were able to pay lower premiums for more and better care because money was spent efficiently and appropriately.
